The Grumman XF5F Skyrocket was designed as a lightweight carrier-borne fighter for the U.S. Navy. It was a distinctive design featuring twin engines and a forward fuselage which did not extend past the leading edge of the wing. The prototype flew for the first time on 01 April 1940. (NASM Rudy Arnold Collection)
The Skyrocket was powered by two Wright R-1820 Cyclone radial engines which produced 1,200 each. The R-1820 was widely used in several U.S. designs of the period and was produced under license in Spain and the Soviet Union. Armament was two 20 mm cannon. (NASM Rudy Arnold Collection)
The combination of light weight and high horsepower gave the Skyrocket impressive performance. Initial rate of climb was 4,000 feet per minute (1,220 m/min), easily outpacing the XF4U Corsair prototype. Maximum speed was 383 mph (616 km/h). (NASM Rudy Arnold Collection)
The Skyrocket featured several desirable characteristics for a carrier aircraft. The propellers were engineered to rotate in opposite directions which eliminated the issue of torque on take-off. The twin engines provided redundancy in case of damage or mechanical failure, a feature the U.S. Navy would come to require for later designs. The stubby nose did not restrict the vision of the pilot during shipboard recovery. (NASM Rudy Arnold Collection)
The wings were designed to be folded to increase storage capacity aboard the aircraft carrier from the outset, a feature lacking on several of the naval aircraft in service at the time.
Cockpit design was conventional. Visible at the bottom of the photograph is the transparency through the lower fuselage, a common feature on naval aircraft which allowed the pilot to view the carrier deck on landing approach.
Port side of the cockpit interior showing the twin throttle arrangement.
Grumman also developed the design to meet a USAAC requirement for a land-based twin-engine interceptor which became known as the XP-50 Skyrocket . This featured an extended nose and redesigned engine nacelles which improved both the maximum speed and rate of climb.
While the XP-50 was promising, the USAAF ultimately decided not to produce either it nor the competing Lockheed XP-49, instead focusing efforts on improving the performance of the Lockheed P-38 which was already in production.
The U.S. Navy decided not to adopt the Skyrocket as its standard shipboard fighter, opting instead for another Grumman design, the F4F Wildcat. The Wildcat was favored because of its reduced cost and mechanical complexity. Grumman continued to operate and make modifications to the Skyrocket prototype until it was damaged in a belly landing on 11DEC44. However, the concepts pioneered by the Skyrocket were eventually refined and developed into the successful F7F Tigercat.
Published by Jeff Groves
Scale Modeling and Military History
View all posts by Jeff Groves
Published
July 8, 2020 July 8, 2020
Another little gem Jeff! Love it 😊
LikeLiked by 2 people
An odd little design but it had some advantages, shame it didn’t go into production.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Brilliant, Jeff! 🙂 I think the Skyrocket and the Airacuda are my two favourite late 1930s planes!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks John!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I always love this plane. So cool, its not hard to imagine the F5F getting the contracts the F6F got and filling much the same role.
Nice pictures!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sounds like a real hot rod too!
LikeLiked by 1 person